

The SEC has approved Nasdaq’s plan for tokenized securities trading, marking a significant integration of blockchain in traditional markets. Meanwhile, Hong Kong is tightening crypto licensing rules, warning exchanges of strict compliance requirements. Nigeria has charged Binance executives with tax evasion, highlighting regulatory challenges in crypto. U.S. lawmakers are concerned over the SEC enforcement chief’s…

The past week delivered major developments across crypto litigation, regulation, and capital markets. From a high-profile defamation suit involving Binance to new guidance from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, regulators and courts continue to shape the legal framework governing digital assets. Below are the key stories defining crypto law this week. 1. Binance Sues…

A federal court has blocked Binance’s attempt to push token-sale lawsuits into arbitration, allowing investors to proceed in federal court. Turkey has proposed a new tax framework for cryptocurrencies, including a 10% tax on gains. A court dismissed liability claims against Uniswap, emphasizing the liability distinction for decentralized platforms. Kraken’s banking arm gained access to…

The Clarity Act has a high likelihood of passing soon, according to Ripple’s CEO, with key components debated, particularly around stablecoin structures. A March 1 deadline set by the White House aims to resolve these issues, potentially facilitating comprehensive digital asset legislation. The SEC has eased capital treatment for certain stablecoins, enhancing their appeal for…

Digital-asset activity has evolved far beyond simple token sales. Today, many of the most consequential legal questions arise not from standalone issuances, but from programmatic mechanisms—staking arrangements, liquidity pools, lending protocols, airdrop campaigns, and NFT ecosystems. These structures often challenge traditional securities analysis because value is generated through a mix of code, incentives, governance, and…

The Token Itself Is Not Always the Security A central development in modern crypto jurisprudence is the growing recognition that a token, standing alone as a digital object, is not automatically a security. What may constitute a security is the investment contract—the arrangement, scheme, or promises surrounding the token’s distribution—rather than the token itself. Several…

Since the inception of digital assets, “utility token” has been perceived as a non-security designation. However, the SEC has challenged this notion, treating utility as only one aspect of a broader evaluation under the Howey test. Courts assess whether purchasers rely on issuers’ efforts for token value, focusing on sales timing and issuer control. Even…

The classification of crypto assets as securities remains a complex issue in 2025, despite years of regulatory scrutiny. Courts have varied in their interpretations, distinguishing between the tokens themselves and their sales context. While the SEC’s aggressive enforcement has created uncertainty within the regulatory environment, recent indications show a possible shift towards clearer guidelines and…

In Paul Atkins’ speech, “The SEC’s Approach to Digital Assets,” he indicates a shift in the SEC’s regulatory stance, from strict enforcement to embracing digital asset innovation while prioritizing market integrity. He introduces a taxonomy for digital assets, distinguishing between securities and non-securities based on their functionality. Atkins highlights that tokens might evolve from investment…

The SEC and CFTC’s joint statement clarifies that registered exchanges can facilitate trading in certain spot crypto-asset products, promoting regulatory clarity and market innovation. While not binding, it encourages compliance and proactive engagement from exchanges. This marks a shift toward supportive regulation in the U.S. crypto landscape, focusing on investor protection and market integrity.